The fallacy of fascism
This sermon was delivered at
Welling Methodist Church on 15 Sept 2019 where I was invited to preach as my
second cousin is a steward there:
I have recently joined the
facebook page promoting Welling and t seems there is quite a sense of community
here. It is nice to see the positive posts amid all the news relating to much
darker themes.
An American President overseeing
the removal of children from their parents – openly encouraging racial hatred
and claiming to be like the King of Israel. A Brazilian Premier playing power
games whilst the Amazon burns. A Prime
Minister at war with parliament, backing the voices of separation
Against that background, the
lectionary provides us today with readings from the book of Jeremiah and the
Gospel of Luke – the Gospel writer who espouses the cause of the outcast.
Jeremiah is essentially a
book of poetry written for the Jews who were in exile. The language is almost apocalyptic in nature.
We have a dialogue between Jeremiah and God. Whoever actually wrote the book of
Jeremiah, we see strongly emotive language, a sense of desolation, secondary to
a breakdown in relationship and trust.
The author presents himself as having a sense of the divine and the
picture that is painted is reminiscent in many ways to that of a broken
marriage with emotions extremely unstable and accusations hurled in every
direction.
Jeremiah announces an attack
from the North – an image taken to represent darkness. Some scholars consider
the Babylonians were the attackers, others have suggested nomadic attackers
from Southern Russia, however, there is
no hint of date so the author is clearly suggesting a mythical enemy of great
power. Imagine how some of the exiles
Jews must have been feeling. They had lost their homeland, lost their
citizenship status, most likely subsistence existences as slaves – second class
citizens. Separated from family members perhaps, without any ability to
influence their own present or future.
It doesn’t take too much of a leap of faith to see how they might view
this enemy as supernaturally sent by God as judgement. If you have any doubts as to this, consider
how in the so called illuminated viewpoint of the 21st Century some
of the facebook posts from the USA make demons out of whichever is the faction
the post writer opposes.
Consider how this contrasts
with Jesus’ take on judgement. Context,
as they say, is everything. Jesus was facing opposition from every direction.
His own family had tried to kidnap him earlier in Luke chapter 8, the storm then
increased metaphorically in Chapter 8 with Jesus at the mercy of the elements
on board the disciples’ boat. Illness,
death, chaos; Jesus faces increasing opposition. In Chapter 12, he announces in
a similar echo of Jeremiah that he has come to bring fire to the earth, he has
come to bring division. Here, like, Jeremiah, Jesus is talking about
consequences. He is bringing a message that will being change. Change is never
welcome, at least among those experiencing it.
The consequences of the message that Jesus brings to the social and
political setting of the 1st Century means discomfort, likely
discord, civil strife; opinions raised against one another. Jesus in his actions themselves created
division in society. Healing the beaten,
raising people from the dead; thus removing death from the ultimate control
measure, upsetting the ruling family in Jerusalem. He increasingly was being followed by those
whom society had deemed dirty and unclean.
Jesus clearly showed contempt for the cleanliness laws that in his
perception separated people from an experience of God and from being included
in society. The Gospel writer refers to
tax collectors, sinners. Today we might
think of loan sharks, pimps and prostitutes.
If Jesus were here in Welling today, how would we feel if we found our
congregations being taken over in increasing numbers by the sort of people we
would rather not spend time with?
I wonder how popular Jesus
would be? Would he be fĂȘted by the
political elite, or would we find him wining and dining with what we might
think to be the underbelly of society. So
Jesus told the elite this parable.
I’ve said before that Jesus’
parables aren’t cosy stories, they are more like chocolate coated chilli
peppers without the chocolate.
So Jesus searches for the
lost sheep. He is the shepherd. The
shepherd it is worth remembering is an outcast figure in 1st century
Judea; they were people who just couldn’t be trusted. He insists on looking for and rescuing the
one, instead on following logic that suggests the needs of the many outweigh
the needs of the one. No one to Jesus is
a lost cause. The woman with 10 silver
coins and loses 1. She still has 9, but is obsessive it seems about finding the
lost 1.
It is a topsy turvy attitude
to life because 1at century life didn’t care about the poor, women or children.
They were expendable, worthless. The
elite of the time kept this attitude going and it is that attitude that Jesus
is calling out. He is saying this is wrong. Everyone counts. Everyone’s life
matters. Not just mine because I might be wearing a suit, but the person hopelessly
addicted to heroin – their life is just as important. The old person with dementia, they are still
valued for their humanity, the transgender, the gay couple, the people made
invisible by disability.
If we think we can build a
society where we are all nice and polite and white, Jesus is saying out loud
that this society is fake!
The only way that type of
society happens is when those considered as other get tramples, pushed out or
persecuted. This world has experienced that in the 1930s in Germany and more
recently in the Balkan conflict acutely witnessed at Srebrenica.
In Jeremiah’s time, society
had turned away from God, or thought and felt that they were being punished for
having done so.
In Jesus’ time, Jerusalem was
being run by a core group of similar minded families for their own
benefit.
Today, we are seeing the rise
of separatist groups in all races and all areas of the world. This country stands divided on a precipice. History
teaches us that extremism doesn’t end well. The scriptures here also teach us
about consequences. Jesus warns us of
consequences; of how we will attract opposition by speaking the truth, but also
that true society can only be inclusive. A society with missing pieces is
flawed. It is a fallacy to think we can “Go it alone”
So my challenge to you is
simple. Look around you. Look your neighbours in the eye.
You might want to look for
and embrace difference in your community. It sounds coy, but ask yourselves:
What would Jesus do?
In Jesus name
Amen
Comments
Post a Comment