When Brexit challenges a preachers ability to forgive - what next?
I have been a while since I shared my thinking in my preaching mode. In part that is because I have been placed on less preaching engagements recently, something that I have to say I am secretly relieved at due to my current postgraduate education studies and work commitments.
There have also been some other significant changes in my personal circumstances. Those of you who have followed this blog before will know that about 3 years ago I suffered a period of severe depression. Well the good news is that I have come off my antidepressants. A side effect of this is that I am learning how to cope with emotions again that are stronger again since I have stopped taking the drugs. I have always wished that I could emulate the logical thinking of my role models Spock of Vulcan and Sherlock Holmes. Holmes of course had his own weakness to be found in an opium syringe and Spock was more emotional than he would ever let on. Learning to cope with emotions as they surface though is something that I am now having to share with my beloved Vulcan and something that I am taking on a day to day basis.
Attached is a sermon I gave today in Maidstone; the County town of Kent. My country is just over 30 days away from disastrously exiting the EU (in my opinion anyway), and when I wrote the sermon I was forced to reflect on my own difficulties concerning forgiveness; especially those who are in Westminster and have the capacity but not it seems the will or the morality to stop the process. How do I face this? How do I find the power to forgive the likes of Rees-Mogg, Farage, Johnson or May.
Read on and share some of my journey if you wish :)
Sermon Union Street 24.02.2019
Our second reading from the Gospel of Luke is a segment of
one of perhaps the most famous snapshots of Jesus’ life: The sermon on the
mount. I’d like to ask you at this
point, what springs to your mind when you think of the sermon on the mount?
Do you think of Robert Powell’s Jesus - a figure dressed in
white preaching to large numbers of people who seem ignorant?
Do you see a figure in the distant or close at hand?
What do the words Sermon and Mount bring to mind?
In the 21st Century a sermon is viewed as a
static affair, with the preacher standing in a place of “honour” expounding on
ancient scriptures to people who are feeding on every word. Well, perhaps not quite like that but you get
the gist, it isn’t likely to be viewed as a discussion or a tutorial. How many
of you would have been prepared to come to church to discuss the scripture
readings? Less than those expecting to
be spoken at by a preacher and then to have the service over in an hour to get
the things done that are on our various “to do lists” I suspect. How we view a setting can easily affect how
we approach something. If we come to this scripture with an understanding of a
sermon as a passive venture, how far will we go to struggle with the scripture,
to challenge it, to listen to it, to grapple with the meaning?
We see it as a major preaching event on a mountain, but what
if the sermon on the mount was more like a discussion on a hillside. What does
that picture paint in your brain?
First off, it appears in 2 out of the 4 gospels. Mark and
John don’t actually mention the event, so just how critical is it, and more
importantly why do Matthew and Luke include it in their gospel narratives. The fact that is doesn’t appear in all the
gospels doesn’t mean that it isn’t important of course; we need to remember
that the gospels are not written to reflect an unbiased biography of Jesus’
life. If you want an unbiased book, go
read the telephone directory. No; the
gospels were written with a clear purpose in mind; one that they often make
clear at the outset. Luke, the writer of the gospel we have listened to today,
introduces his work as a personal account to an individual called Theophilus,
IN ORDER THAT Theophilus may know the truth of what he has been instructed in.
Mark introduces his book as the “beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ”.
The point of the gospels is to help the reader realise what Jesus was
about. It is a given for the writers
that something significant has happened and they want to guide the reader in
order that the reader can “get it!” IF
we stop for a moment and take that on board, then each point the authors make
is designed to impact on the reader, to assist us in realising who and what
Jesus is.
Let us then for a moment compare the two excerpts of
scripture today. In Genesis, Joseph forgives his brothers for their earlier
attempts to kill him, which looks like it fits with Jesus’ message of
forgiveness. But, there is a difference, let us take a closer look. Joseph when he forgives his brothers is a
major player in Egypt; second only to the Pharoah. It is like being the Vice President in USA or
a senior politician in the UK. He has
power. He therefore chooses to forgive
his brothers, but he does so from a position without personal risk. What has Joseph got to lose? What we see here is a transaction. He can
regain a relationship with his brothers and with his Father but it is on his
terms. I will argue to you that this is
significantly different from what Jesus is mandating in his teaching. Jesus
takes the concept of forgiveness, the idea of not holding a grudge, of not
setting ourselves up as judge and jury. He takes this idea of forgiveness and
stretches it to the limit. Like the cleanliness
laws that Jesus shows up for their hypocrisy; Jesus demands forgiveness from
positions of weakness as well as strength. What good does it do you to like
your friend? Love your enemy – that shows you are serious. What good does it do to you to forgive your
best friend. Forgive instead your parents or your boss, forgive a government
who wreck your opportunities.
Forgiveness from a position of weakness when you have nothing to gain
and everything to lose shows you are serious.
Luke has a scenario where Jesus calls people being struck on
the side of a cheek to show the other. We have this in our language today and
it has become part of what is said. Jesus had something particular in mind for
his audience. If someone strikes you with the back of their hand how do they do
this. Picture it in your mind. It isn’t
a slap, it is violence with the back of the hand. It shows a total disregard
for the person being hit. If you are hit like this you are worthless in the
eyes of the perpetrator. Jesus calls for
his audience not to fight back but to offer the other cheek! There is probably a whole sermon in that one
sentence. Jesus is setting a picture as usual to show what he is asking for. To
be different. I doubt if he was suggesting that a woman allows her partner to
strike her and then offer to do it again by the way! No, he is asking his followers to understand
the picture. Those who would strike with
the back of their hand would likely be the occupying forces; the Romans. Jesus
is therefore calling for passive resistance, for peaceful resistance. Not to
choose the option of the zealots and fight back but to choose a different
path. This speaks directly into the idea
of forgiveness from a position of weakness. Jesus’ audience would have known
exactly what Jesus was talking about, they lived the life of occupation, where
the wrong look could lead to violence, the wrong word could lead to much worse
– something Matthew refers to when he has Jesus exhorting his followers to go
the extra mile if ordered to walk a mile. The reference to the word Mile being
a clear reference to the Roman Army. If you were “asked” to walk a mile, it
would be under guard on the way to your execution.
Luke’s gospel highlights particularly the right of the
outsider, not only the refugee, but also those deemed to be on the edges of the
community; those who didn’t fit in. Today this might be those with an invisible
disability such autism, chronic pain, anxiety and or depression. It might be
someone who is LGBT. The Kingdom of God is
shown by Luke to be inclusive, and followers of Jesus are required to be the
image of God to all. We should therefore imitate Jesus in the way we approach
the world. We are called to stand for
the underdog, to defend the rights of the dispossessed.
We are called to be merciful and forgiving and to risk doing
so from a position of weakness. Does this mean that we let oppressors have
their own way? With the current
political uncertainty and upheaval in both UK and USA, it is difficult to see
how we should respond in the wake of scripture such as this? Jesus never of course backed away from
difficult scenarios and was often the first to highlight hypocrisy among the
ruling classes. Somehow we need to follow his lead and do so whilst avoiding
the temptation to become like those we are required to criticize. Rather we are
charged with trying to become an imitation of Christ. How we do this I can’t tell you; but I can
say that the more you reach out and into the mind of God the more you will be
able to follow that path.
May Jesus help us all in the coming weeks as we try and
follow his example
In Jesus name
Amen
Comments
Post a Comment