What do you hear when you read the Bible?
When
you read the Bible, what do you hear? Do
you hear the words of an angry and jealous God in what we call the Old
Testament? Do you hear a God biding his
time until a day of Wrath and Judgement?
Does
God seem different to you, in our so-called New Testament? If that’s the case, could it be that we have
been led to believe in an interpretation that in fact sells itself short and
leaves us confused and possible disenchanted?
There are lots of questions here, because I strongly believe we are in a
time when we should be asking ourselves questions, as a church, as a family, as
a community, as a country.
The
Gospel means “Good news”. In the early
days and years of the church, the message was clearly interpreted as Good News
by the poor and scary to those in power.
When we preach the Gospel today, is that still the same? Why doesn’t it seem to have the same power as
back then? Why would most people equate
the Gospel with “Bad News”, with a call to lead a boring life, rather than a message
of freedom from slavery? For instead of
a message of freedom. People hear a message of slavery. If that is the case, have we been getting it
wrong? When did the way become just
another option of belief open to people in a world that refused to accept any
one particular truth?
What
would happen if people instead heard a message of forgiveness and of freedom
rather than of judgement and slavery?
Whether we look at traditional or more charismatic styles of worship, we
have tended to embrace a vision of Jesus being sent from heaven to save his
flock and to rescue them FROM the world in order to take them to heaven. It’s a model that is especially prevalent in
the popular American model, in which we see mega-churches, TV evangelists and
claims of rapture at the end times. The
real problem is that the original message has been totally divorced from its
original context and words and their original meanings have been forced into a
totally different worldview. It’s not
surprising that the message has lost it’s force. It is a model where we all too readily
restrict Jesus and the Holy Spirit to a role that only consists of personal
salvation. How easily we try and box
Jesus again. This leaves us with
conferences that rely on conversion stories, of individual testimonies from an
ex burglar, murderer or drug addict. Is
this really what the original writers of the Gospels or Letters had in mind?
Let
us therefore take a look at our readings today and try and compare different
ways of looking at them and then attempt to see if we can obtain a more
congruent message from both pre-Christian and Christian scriptures. My way of saying “Old and New
Testaments”.
The
very first thing to keep in mind is that when they were written all of our
scriptures were written from within a Jewish worldview. It seems a basic thing
to say, be we easily forget it and we desperately need to keep in at the
forefront of our mind if we hope to stop ourselves falling into bad habits too
easily. In other words, so that we can
understand them better, we need to try and read them from the viewpoint of a
first or second temple Jew. We need to
put aside if we can views of an atheistic enlightenment that has impacted on
our interpretation of these scriptures where God is placed more and more as a
peripheral player leaving humanity to sort things out as we like.
If
we read Isaiah as though every use of the word “I” relates to the prophet
himself, we will tend to be led towards an individual model of salvation as I
have warned about already. More than
that though, Isaiah 49 v 3 just makes no sense, as here the identity of the individual
is unambiguously that of Israel itself, “He said to me, you are my servant
Israel”. So the “I” here needs to be
read as referring to Israel. At other
times it is much more confusing of course and it sounds like a story about a
person. We are left with the
question. What is going on? Perhaps it is a complex piece of writing that
allows for both understandings, that challenges us to see multiple
interpretations and hold them together.
One
of the important things, is that is we allow ourselves to read the OT through
the eyes of Israel, the nation called to be a light to the nations, then
instead of seeing a vengeful, angry, jealous God we can see instead God showing
intentional and unconditional love towards the people whom He chose to fix creation. I believe that we also see that this is
echoed in Psalm 40. God is ever faithful
to the covenant that he has made with Israel even if Israel isn’t, or can’t be.
Paul,
who is a Jew in case we forget, sees this and sees in Jesus God coming as human
to do what Israel can’t do and in so doing fulfills their part of the
covenant. This completion, then is
directly what allows Paul to reach out to the rest of the world. Phase 1 has been completed with Jesus’
crucifixion. Phase 2 was announced with
the resurrection. We are in phase 2,
preaching forgiveness of sins and freedom from exile, and praising the one true
God.
We,
like the church in Corinth, are now freed from the societal constraints to
worship idols other than God; we need of course to remind ourselves every
day. We are now free to worship the one
true God who has defeated and made powerless the idols that we have ourselves
created, and the ones that we continue to create. Those empty puffed up idols of celebrity,
power, sex and money; tools that we have given over control to rather than
managing and enjoying responsibly, that continue to wreak havoc principally
because we forget that they are now powerless and like unsupervised toddlers
they create destruction in their wake.
It
means that you are free to be what you are meant to be, an image of the one
true God. How do we do this? We are
called to reflect God to the world in order that whoever me might meet gets to
in turn meet with God themselves to experience the intentional and
unconditional love on which creation itself is built.
Next
time you read the bible, ask yourself; What do you hear?
In
the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit
Amen
Comments
Post a Comment