T'was the week before Christmas
Readings: Isaiah 7:10-17; Matthew 1:18-25
It’s
one week to go until Christmas. In the
words of Corporal Jones; Don’t Panic!!
In
the last minute rush when we suddenly get a card or a present from someone we
haven’t provided for, or when we might be forced into sudden changes of plans;
it is easy to forget that the Christmas that we celebrate these days bears
little in relation to the first Christmas.
In other words we say we remember the birth of Jesus, but really we run
about buying presents and have we done this, have we done that??
Our
readings today from Isaiah and the Gospel of Matthew contain some points that
if we take the time to look at them with a fresh set of eyes, may help in
leading us to a deeper and more meaningful understanding of the so-called
Christmas Story. I’ll come back to the
manner in which we call it a story later, but just for the moment, that phrase,
how does it make you feel? Do you feel
uncomfortable with the term Christmas story?
Does it suggest that it really didn’t happen? That it is just a story? Hold that thought. For now though let’s dive into Isaiah. Isaiah, as much as can be certain is believed
to have lived about 700 years before Jesus’ birth and it was writings by Isaiah
and Daniel in particular that Jesus was strongly affected by and ones that he
significantly used during his ministry.
Isaiah was considered to be one of the greatest Prophets (if not THE
greatest) of the Old Testament period, and very interestingly, guess what the
name Isaiah means. It is translated as
“The Lord Saves”; an enticing echo perhaps of the very meaning of Jesus own
name, “He who saves”.
Isaiah
prophecies that a young woman would give birth to a child who would signify
“God with us”. When we hear this now we
immediately assume Isaiah must have been talking about Jesus, it is such a
close fit, however in the immediate context of Isaiah’s writing, this
particular picture surrounds a relatively near event. In Ch. 8 Isaiah and a Prophetess bear a child
who may well be the “immanuel” of Ch 7.
However, since scripture always has multiple levels of meaning, later
interpretations have pointed forward to a young Aramaic woman called Mary who
was also of marriageable age (about 14 or so).
The Aramaic word for a woman such as this also could be understood to be
a virgin, which perhaps challenges our thinking that Mary actually had a virgin
birth. When we get into a 2 and 8 about
this, perhaps we need to consider that often translating ancient texts such as
scripture is a really challenging task, and we may be making issues about what
is really just a language thing. For me,
I have to say I don’t spend too much time worrying about whether Mary had a
virgin birth or not, that in itself doesn’t prove to me that Jesus is who he
claimed to be. Of course the later
interpretations of this particular passage from Isaiah also suggested that this
pointed forward to Jesus, the root of Jesse and David who would be the full
provision of “God with us”.
So
from my vantage point in 21St Century Britain, I can’t say for sure
that Mary had a virgin birth. I would
say this though. Questions of whether
Mary had had sex before she gave birth to Jesus miss the point of what was
happening that first Christmas. If we
get too focused on how many magi there were, were there shepherds? What was the Star? How did it stand still? Who was the
innkeeper? Was there one? Was Jesus born in a stable or in the upper
room of of a house from one of Joseph’s family?
If we concentrate too much on these things then we actually get
distracted and go further off the track.
Matthew
and Luke in their Gospels paint a picture.
They use picture language to help the reader understand. They tell a story if you like (there’s that
word story again). They are trying to
help us understand that something of huge, enormous, stupendous even
significance had happened. They tried to
help us understand that this child was in some mysterious way, truly God with
us. That in this child who would grow to
an adult, the full glory of the divine presence rested. That somehow this child was in some weird
way, extremely difficult to explain, the great I AM who spoke to Moses, the God
of Abraham, Jacob and Moses, the Lord of Israel himself. The child is the meeting place of Heaven and
Earth. Jesus is the new Temple. He is a human equivalent of the Ark of the
Covenant.
From
this comes the language. This is why we
get skies filled with Angels, a star standing still above Bethlehem. The writing is intentionally a bit crazy
because the audience is called to realise that this is something that is extra
special.
It’s
not some ancient version of Alien visitation though. Jesus isn’t a 1st Century
superman. No, the miracle is much more
profound. God enters his creation in the
form of a vulnerable human child. In
this child, all of creation, not just humanity but the whole of creation will
be put right not by some neat special effects cooked up in a Hollywood studio
but by the child growing to adulthood, experiencing all the things we all get
to have, snotty noses, illness, wet nappies the lot. Jesus would become what we were always meant
to be, an image of God witnessing the glory of God to His creation, and in so
doing, to go on and defeat all the dark forces that we have let enslave
us. In Jesus we learn to fully praise
and worship God and to bear witness to the truth.
If
we do this, we echo our true purpose to be and image of God and we aid in the
ongoing work of healing Creation that will come to final fruition at the right
time.
This
Christmas, I have a simple challenge for you.
When you see the child in the manger, look again. What do you really see? And more importantly, what will you do as a
result?
In
the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit
Amen
Comments
Post a Comment