Chrysalis Bible Study Luke 2: 21-40
Luke 21-40
Ref:
Oxford Bible Commentary – Barton and Muddiman
Luke
– Tyndale New Testament Commentaries – L Morris
The
Wrong Messiah – N Page
Luke
21.
Jesus
presented to the Temple for naming and circumcision day 8, See notes on
presentation and naming of John the Baptist.
Focus on name given by Angel Gabriel
V
22-24
At
a different time, presumably Joseph and Mary were living somewhere in the city
or just outside – could they have been staying at Bethany?? - my
opinion only - Could the parents
of Lazarus, Mary and Martha have been related to Joseph or Mary?? We don’t know. Most authorities would probably suggest they
stayed in Bethlehem for a while (5 miles from Jerusalem), but IF they had
further relatives in Bethany, this was only 1 ½ miles from the City so may have
been a useful short stop over base.
There
are 2 presentations here. One is for the purification of Mary at 40 days, (it
would have been 80 days if Jesus was a girl! – a commentary of the overtly
patriarchal society of the time), and one for the purchase of Jesus (the first
born) from God.
Luke
suggests the purification was for both parents, which is unusual according to
the Law, but Joseph, may well have been considered defiled by his close
proximity to Mary, especially if they were being forced to live in a one-roomed
domicile due to their poverty.
The
gift they gave was a part of the sacrifice as outlined in Leviticus 12:8, for
people who could not afford a young lamb.
This is another clue to their poverty.
The
other presentation was of a payment of 5 shekels to the Temple. Why? Numbers
18:14. The firstborn male offspring of a
womb is devoted to God and needs to be redeemed. Only animals such as Ox, Sheep and Goat, were
exempted only as they were sacrificed!
V
27-36
Simeon.
Always
considered to be an old man, but there is no evidence for this. Apart from this interaction we know nothing
of this man.
He
is filled with the Spirit and arrives at the temple at the same time as the
parents. Simeon offers acceptance of Jesus
the Messiah by the Temple, which stands for Israel. He also focuses in his speech (now known within
Church music as the Nunc Dimitis – Now I can be dismissed - ) the proclamation
that Jesus is for all peoples. Jesus’
being the light to the Gentiles does not lessen the glory of Israel but rather
gives it it’s fullest realization.
It
further points out that the Salvation work will not be achieved through
military power but by surrender. He
foresees the hurt Mary will face in a personal level, the word for sword used
was Rhomphaia meaning a LARGE sword
as opposed to to Machaira used
during the last supper and in Gethsemane which refers to a small sword.
V
36-38
Anna
Anna
is added as a prophetess, her name means “Grace”. We know more about her than Simeon. She lived in the temple compound, she was 84
years old , and had been widowed for many years. The curious bit is that she is of the tribe
of Asher. This was one of the northern
tribes of Israel, Anna is the only Jewish figure in the New Testament to be
so. Everyone else comes from the tribes
of Levi, Judah or Benjamin. Anna then is
an outsider. Again this is a strong
theme of Luke’s Gospel who highlights Jesus Gospel to outsiders. Anna spoke of the child to all who were
searching for the Redemption of Jerusalem.
This phrase was referring to the deliverance to be produced by the
Messiah.
Anna
is highlighted as a Prophetess, there had been no prophet for hundreds of years
so this is important and noteworthy, and the Talmud (a central sacred text of
Rabbinic Judaism) only references 7 prophetesses in all.
V
39-40
Luke
tells us that the family then return to Nazareth. There is no mention of the flight to
Egypt. We don’t know whether that had
occurred prior to the events or after.
My suspicion is that is occurred after, as Herod called for the
destruction of all boys under the age of 2 in Bethlehem not realizing that the
child’s family was not a resident, though the flight to Egypt may in fact speak
of a wider threat to the child’s safety.
Interestingly
the Child Messiah would have been in Jerusalem perhaps at the same time as the
arch enemy Herod the Great, who would shortly attempt to destroy him.
CJW
Comments
Post a Comment